As political parties gear up for the 2027 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections, the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) once again finds itself battling allegations that have followed it for years—that money plays a role in the selection of poll candidates.
The latest controversy erupted after a media sting operation allegedly recorded senior BSP functionaries discussing payments required to secure a party ticket. The investigation claimed that aspiring candidates were expected to pay between Rs 3.35 crore and Rs 3.5 crore for an assembly poll nomination and that even arranging a meeting with BSP chief Mayawati involved a payment of Rs 5 lakh.
Among those named in the report was the BSP’s Uttar Pradesh president Vishwanath Pal. The allegations quickly triggered a political debate, particularly because they surfaced at a time when all major parties have begun finalising their electoral strategies for 2027.
The BSP has strongly rejected the allegations. Mayawati described the sting as part of a larger conspiracy aimed at weakening the BSP ahead of the elections. In a detailed post on X, she said the BSP was unlike other parties because it functioned through the contributions of supporters and workers rather than relying on big industrialists or wealthy donors.
She argued that financial support received by the party was legal and largely used to strengthen election campaigns and ensure the success of party candidates. According to Mayawati, attempts to portray these contributions as evidence of wrongdoing were intended to divert attention from the functioning and electoral preparations of other parties.
The BSP chief also defended party leaders involved in candidate selection, saying they routinely question prospective candidates about their social standing, political background, financial capacity and commitment to the organisation. Such interactions, she suggested, were being selectively presented without context.
The controversy comes at a sensitive time for the BSP. After suffering a steady decline in electoral influence over the past decade, the party is attempting to stage a revival ahead of the 2027 polls. Unlike the BJP and the Samajwadi Party, which remain engaged in regular electoral battles and organisational mobilisation, the BSP has often preferred a quieter style of functioning between elections. As a result, moments that pull the party back into the political spotlight tend to attract disproportionate attention.
The timing is significant for another reason. Candidate selection is among the most closely watched aspects of BSP politics. Unlike many parties where local leaders or caste equations often dominate ticket distribution, the BSP has historically maintained a highly centralised decision-making structure, with final authority resting with the party leadership. This has frequently led to speculation and allegations from political opponents as well as former party leaders.
The controversy has also revived a debate that has long followed the BSP and its funding model. For decades, the party has projected itself as an organisation that runs on contributions collected from cadre and supporters rather than financial backing from large corporate groups. Membership drives, donation campaigns and fund-collection exercises have been central to the BSP’s organisational structure since the days of party founder Kanshi Ram.
At the same time, allegations of money being linked to ticket distribution have periodically surfaced, particularly during election seasons. Several former BSP leaders, over the years, publicly alleged that candidates were expected to pay substantial amounts to secure nominations.
The party has consistently denied any wrongdoing and maintained that funds collected from aspirants and supporters are legitimate contributions used for organisational work and election campaigns.
The latest sting operation has once again brought those questions back into the spotlight. The episode has also reopened an old debate about how political parties raise funds, how candidates are selected, and where the line can be drawn between organisational contributions and the alleged pay-to-play system.
Subscribe to India Today Magazine
– Ends
